Page 11 - ผลของการใช้วัสดุเหลือใช้ทางการเกษตรร่วมกับปุ๋ยเคมีต่อการตอบสนองของผลผลิตข้าว และการเปลี่ยนแปลงสมบัติของดิน
P. 11

ห้องสมุดกรมพัฒนาที่ดิน







                                                               Abstract

                         The  effect  of  crop  residue  management,  combined  with  application  of  chemical

                  fertilizer,  on  rice  (RD-MAEJO2)  yield  response,  soil  properties  and  economic  return  was
                  investigated in Baan Nam Lork, Bor Thong sub-district, Thong Sean Khan district, Uttaradit
                  province. The experiment was carried out in Renu soil series, soil group no. 17, from October
                  2013 to September 2016. The experimental design was a randomized complete block of 9
                  treatments  with  3  replicaions.  The  treatments  included  farmer’s  management  (N=21.4

                  P O =4.0 and K O=0 kg/rai) with no soil conditioners, chemical fertilizer based on soil test
                   2 5
                                 2
                  (N=12.0 P O =8.0 and K O=6.0 kg/rai), corn cob charcoal at rate of 100, 300 and 500 kg/rai
                           2 5
                                         2
                  combined with chemical fertilizer based on soil test, rice husk charcoal at rate of 100, 300
                  and 500 kg/rai combined with chemical fertilizer based on soil test, and 300 kg/rai of cow
                  dung combined with chemical fertilizer based on soil test. The results showed that there
                  were no significant differences in soil pH, organic matter, available phosphorus, extractable
                  potassium, yield components such as number of tillers, spikes per plants, grain per spike and

                  its  dry  weight,  and  tillers’  height,  among  treatments.  However,  application  of  rice  husk
                  charcoal with chemical fertilizer provided 1,038.8 kg/rai of rice yield production, which was
                  greater  than  the  yield  response  to  farmer’s  management,  while  farmer’s  management
                  provided greater economic return of 15.58 baht/rai. This is due to there was no cost of crop

                  residue management for soil improvement, resulting in farmer’s management provided the
                  best economic return with the B/C ratio of 2.61.
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16